Knock for 6 Devlog #1 - RIB02

-

Knock for 6 Devlog #1        

TLDR: I consider the outline for the game to be complete, barring some technicalities in mechanic interactions. The next step is to write out the rules thoroughly before some preliminary playtesting and formatting of the publication.

        Hello everyone, thank you so much for taking a look at the first devlog of Knock for 6. Since I haven’t posted about the actual game before on the blog, I think a bit of an introduction would be helpful.

        Knock for 6 is, as the subtitle states, ‘a game of modern tactical raiding and combat for the tabletop.’ I’m aiming for it to be a 2d6 system with the premise revolving around players operating something akin to a SWAT team as they infiltrate compounds to complete objectives. The game is meant to be highly lethal, and as such players are encouraged to act in a calculated manner. Players will have many tools to help them achieve their goals, which will be discussed more below, as well as options for extended campaign play and for a lot of flexibility in how they like to engage with this game. The compounds are created or run by a ‘Don,’ which is this game’s equivalent to a Dungeon Master, and can be populated with various enemies, traps, tools, and points of intrigue.

My main inspiration for this project is the video game series Door Kickers, and my aims for this are to, hopefully, develop some sort of overarching multi-media franchise with great characters and intrigue, something akin to Black Powder Red Earth and maybe even Warhammer if something so ambitious is merited. I have a lot of ideas but I am only one person, and the practical demands of life often keep me busy. Despite this, I hope to continue making progress and to create something that brings a smile to at least one person’s face. Thank you for your interest.

With all that out of the way, let’s look at some of the outline components. It's important to note that a lot of this is tentative, as playtesting has not occurred, but hopefully my ideas aren’t too shabby. We’ll start with rules for operators, which are what player characters are referred to as:

The first and most important thing to note about operators are the stats, of which there are five in total. These are HP, Armor, Speed, Proficiency, and Reaction.

I’m thinking players can choose between starting with 10 HP or rolling 2d6 for a challenge, but this stat is pretty self explanatory. When HP falls to half, movement range is also cut in half (the operator is wounded, I should probably cut their Proficiency too), and when it falls to 0, the operator is dead. No saving throws here.

Armor is a factor in damage calculation, it is obtained solely through equipment, and cuts Speed. As such all operators have a default Armor stat of 0.

Speed determines movement range, some missions call for high speed units, such as certain hostage rescue and escort missions.

Proficiency is a character's handling, or raw skill. It helps with damage calculation, accuracy with throwables like grenades, and some items need high proficiency to operate, such as ballistic shields and lock picks.

Reaction is used to determine firing order when operators encounter enemies. It is a direct check for who has the higher stat, though bonuses can be granted to either individual depending on line of sight and ambush circumstances (e.g. if you surprise the enemy, +1 to your reaction stat).

These stats support the idea of 3 ‘archetypes’ that operators may inhabit if the player wishes. Assault types have normal stats, Medics can heal operators and have very high Speed at the cost of everything else being low, and Support types have high Speed, high Proficiency for using special items in the field, and a low Reaction stat. When players engage in campaign play, they can level up operators, granting them an extra point in a stat of their choice.

I just realized that this could run a bit long if I were to talk about everything here. I think that next time I’ll talk about Equipment, followed by Scenario Rules, splitting the explanation of the outline into essentially three pieces. I strongly suspect, however, I’ll need multiple parts to flesh out the Scenario Rules for you all. There’s even more to the game I could talk about, such as how Dons can go about designing levels and about different mission types. Although these are included in the outline, descriptions in this devlog series will probably have to wait.

To wrap up, I’m going to HeroesCon 2024 tomorrow (check out the poster by THE Jim Starlin below), as it’s literally in my hometown and the city I live in. I’m also checking out Knave 2e, as I’ve recently gotten my booklet from the recent Kickstarter. I’ll be writing about all this on my blog here in my free time, I hope you enjoy it just as much as I do.

Nikhil Saxena

Founder, Destrier Studios

https://linktr.ee/destrierstudios

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Twilight Struggle Review - RIB20

-
Image
Twilight Struggle Review Disclaimer: I asked for and was provided a review copy courtesy of GMT Games . TLDR: This game belongs on everyone’s shelf, it’s a classic for a reason and a new favorite of mine. Very few gaming experiences that hinge on strategy make you feel the way this game does when making decisions.          Twilight Struggle   is one of the smartest games I’ve ever played. I’ll say right now that although it’s listed as a 2-3 hour game, my experience with this has taken up double that per session. This is mostly because for a new player, and even for me, thinking about what to do takes up more time than you’d think. If two confident and experienced players faced off here, they’d probably only take 2-3 hours, but I played this game with a different person each time, so although my turns were relatively short (let me not lie, I took my time), explaining things and setting up the board while talking about it, as well as simple goofing off, ate up the hours like nothing els
Read more

I, Napoleon Review - RIB18

-
Image
I, Napoleon Review Disclaimer: I asked for and was provided a review copy of the game. I played it multiple times, until I felt that I had achieved the best ending, which to me is a mix of achieving 100 or more glory, having a legitimate son, and bringing peace to Europe all in one run. TLDR: I, Napoleon  is a very engaging solitaire game. The setup and playtime is long, so it is best played on one of those days where you have an evening to yourself and are free of responsibilities. It takes a bit to get the hang of but does a great job of making you feel like the man himself, with all the glory and tension that come with the role.          I, Napoleon  marks a professional achievement for me. It’s the first board/war game I’ve asked for a review copy of, and I made a good choice. I was nervous asking for it, but the individual who helped me out at GMT Games was very nice and the process was butter-smooth. I first learned about the game in a pretty round-about way. I’m very new to warg
Read more

Knave 2e Review - RIB03

-
Image
Knave 2e Review Disclaimer: I have yet to play this with a group of people nor have I touched the first edition. TLDR: Knave 2e shines the most in terms of ease of use. It’s a brilliant way to get an old school game going in a matter of minutes and hooks the players quickly with intuitive systems.          Knave 2e  is, in the author’s own words, “an exploration-driven fantasy RPG and worldbuilding toolkit, inspired by the best elements of the Old-School DnD movement.” There are really two things of note in that description, an emphasis on exploration and trying to incorporate the OSR movement. We’ll touch on both of these but first some background is in order.         The Knave system was developed by Ben Milton who runs the Questing Beast  YouTube channel, which is a must-watch for anyone even remotely interested in OSR style games. I’m going to assume, dear reader, that you are familiar with the OSR movement and style of play, but if not, here  is a brief primer that does a pretty g
Read more